This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

{{first name | friend}}!

Success stories used to dominate business content.

Now failure stories are taking over.

Here's what's driving the shift.

1. The pattern

Scroll through LinkedIn today. The top business posts aren't about wins.

They're about mistakes. Setbacks. Things that went wrong.

"How I lost my first startup" gets more engagement than "How I built a unicorn."

"3 hiring mistakes that cost me $100K" outperforms "3 tips for successful hiring."

2. Why failure content works

Mike Cessario from Monday's email proves this. He leads every Liquid Death story with investor rejections.

Not because he enjoys talking about failure. Because it builds trust faster than success stories.

When someone admits mistakes, we assume they learned something valuable.

3. The trust factor

Success stories trigger skepticism: "What aren't they telling me?"

Failure stories trigger curiosity: "What did they learn?"

In a world where everyone claims to be crushing it, admitting failure makes you stand out as honest.

4. What audiences want

People are tired of motivational content. They want educational content.

"Here's how I succeeded" feels like humble bragging.

"Here's how I failed" feels like practical wisdom.

Success stories inspire. Failure stories teach.

Today’s newsletter is sponsored by Unblocked

Stop babysitting your coding agents

Agents can generate code. Getting it right for your system, team conventions, and past decisions is the hard part – you end up wasting time and tokens in correction loops.

MCPs give agents access to information but not understanding. The teams pulling ahead use a context engine to give agents exactly what they need.

  • Where teams get stuck on the AI maturity curve

  • How a context engine solves for quality, efficiency, and cost

  • Live demo: the same coding task with and without a context engine

5. The business examples

Rand Fishkin: Built SparkToro's entire brand on transparent failure stories from Moz. Positions him as refreshingly honest in an industry full of hype.

Melanie Perkins: Always leads with Canva's 100+ rejections, not the $40B valuation. Makes her more relatable than typical founder stories.

Brian Chesky: Tells Airbnb's cereal box desperation story in every keynote. Shows founders he understands their struggles.

6. The content shift

Five years ago, business content was:

  • "5 secrets to success"

  • "How I built my empire"

  • "The mindset of winners"

Today, winning business content is:

  • "5 mistakes that taught me everything"

  • "How I almost lost my company"

  • "The failure that changed my perspective"

Same lessons. Different framing.

7. The platform evidence

Look at the most-shared business content:

Twitter: Failure threads consistently get more engagement than success threads

Medium: "What went wrong" articles have higher read-through rates

LinkedIn: Posts starting with "I failed" generate more meaningful comments

Podcasts: Audiences prefer "lessons learned" to "how I won"

8. The connection to Tuesday

Remember Tuesday's lesson about using rejections as client magnets?

This is the same principle at scale. The entire content landscape is shifting toward authenticity over achievement.

Sharing failures doesn't make you look weak. It makes you look wise.

9. My take

The failure content trend isn't about being negative. It's about being useful.

In an oversaturated market of success tips, failure lessons cut through.

Your setbacks aren't content liabilities. They're your competitive advantage.

The founders winning today aren't the ones with perfect track records. They're the ones honest about their imperfect ones.

Talk tomorrow,
Stephen

P.S. Like Mike Cessario turning Liquid Death rejections into billion-dollar positioning, smart founders are using their failures as their best content strategy.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading